Karşılaştır
Solidus, gerçekten rekabet ettiği sağlayıcılara karşı
Her rakip için bir sayfa. Her bilginin kaynağı var.
Solidus Verify
Giriş noktamız. Mevcut sağlayıcılar kontrolü satar ve her seferinde yeniden çalıştırır. Solidus, kullanıcının elinde tuttuğu bir W3C Verifiable Credential düzenler; böylece bir sonraki güvenen taraf yalnızca bir imzayı doğrular.
- Sumsub'a karşıSumsub sells the check. Solidus issues a credential the user keeps and re-presents — so the second relying party never re-runs it. Different product category, different cost curve.sumsub alternative →
- Onfido'a karşıOnfido is an enterprise incumbent with Entrust distribution behind it. Solidus is a different category: the check happens once and the credential travels.onfido alternative →
- Persona'a karşıSolidus competes on whether the verification you already paid for travels to the next relying party.persona alternative →
- Veriff'a karşıVeriff's per-session price compounds with every re-onboarding; ours doesn't, because the credential travels to the next relying party instead of re-running the check.veriff alternative →
- Stripe Identity'a karşıStripe Identity's own architecture locks its output to your Stripe account. Solidus issues a credential the user holds and can present anywhere — a portability difference, not a feature-count fight.stripe identity alternative →
Solidus Auth
Mevcut CIAM sağlayıcıları kendi kullanıcılarınızı size her ay, sonsuza dek kiralar; dizin de onların kiracısında barınır. Solidus baştan DID temellidir — kimlik bilgisi kullanıcıya aittir.
- Auth0'a karşıAuth0 rents you your own users, per month, forever, and the directory lives in their tenant. Solidus is DID-native — the credential belongs to the user. We are nowhere near Auth0 on breadth, and that is the trade.auth0 alternative →
- WorkOS'a karşıWorkOS turns enterprise SSO into a $125/month line item per customer connection; Solidus's DID-based credential carries the same federation handshake at protocol cost — but WorkOS ships this today, self-serve, and Solidus's version is tested code behind an admin gate.workos alternative →
- Clerk'a karşıSolidus's argument is standards compliance and credential portability that Clerk structurally doesn't have, not a better sign-up form.clerk alternative →
- Better Auth'a karşıBetter Auth is free, MIT-licensed, self-hosted, and absorbed the actual Auth.js/NextAuth team in September 2025 — for most projects it's simply the right, no-counterparty-risk choice. Solidus doesn't replace it; the plugin that would let them compose isn't built yet.next-auth alternative →
Solidus Identity
Sahip cüzdanı: bir kişinin did:solidus'unu ve buna düzenlenen kimlik bilgilerini sakladığı yer. Bunlar gerçek emsallerimiz — birkaçı DIF'ten meslektaşımız.
- Mattr'a karşıMattr is the credential platform banks and governments already trust; Solidus is the open protocol underneath, for buyers who'd rather hold their own keys than rent Mattr's.mattr alternative →
- walt.id'a karşıwalt.id gives you a full OID4VC issuer/wallet/verifier stack to run yourself. Solidus gives you the same standards plus the network and the KYC issuer already running underneath.walt.id alternative →
- Talao'a karşıTalao is the deepest EUDI-aligned Wallet-as-a-Service running in Europe today. Solidus pairs the same standards with a network and SDK Talao doesn't have, at the cost of no live deployment.talao alternative →
- Credo TS'a karşıCredo TS is excellent, EUDI-embedded infrastructure — and it's a library. Every project built on it still stands up its own network, issuer, and trust registry. Solidus ships all three already running.credo-ts alternative →
- Trinsic'a karşıTrinsic has rebuilt its business model twice since 2019 chasing product-market fit in SSI. The protocol underneath Solidus doesn't change shape every two years.trinsic alternative →
Solidus Agents
Yapay zeka ajanı kimliği. Base Sepolia üzerindeki bir ERC-8004 pasaportu, herkese açık RPC'mizde bir did:solidus DID'ine çözümlenir — bu bir yol haritası slaydı değil, denetlenebilir bir kanıttır.
- zkMe'a karşızkMe proves the same kind of claim we do — but stores it as a soulbound token bound to the agent's own address, not a W3C-anchored, portable credential.zkme alternative →
- Crossmint'a karşıCrossmint already does KYC for agents — but the credential lives inside Crossmint's custody, so every relying party outside Crossmint re-verifies from scratch.crossmint alternative →
- Coinbase AgentKit'a karşıAgentKit gives an agent a wallet and, via x402, a way to pay — it does not give the agent anything a third party can verify beyond 'this address exists.'coinbase agentkit alternative →
Solidus Pod
Kişisel veri depolama. Pod'umuz Solid ile uyumludur ve geçişe hazırdır.
- Inrupt'a karşıInrupt runs the same protocol with an enterprise trust story we don't have yet; we're betting a chain-anchored DID is worth more than a WebID over a multi-year horizon — a bet, not a result.inrupt alternative →
- Vana'a karşıVana pools your data into a Data DAO and sells access to it; Solidus Pod holds a credential you keep and re-present yourself — different products solving different problems, not a feature race.vana alternative →
Solidus Node
Bir node çalıştırmak: kimliğe bağlı doğrulayıcılar için mimari ön izleme sayfaları.
- Allnodes'a karşıAllnodes runs the node for you, today, on 97 chains, for real money; Solidus Node is a self-run, identity-gated validator architecture on a public testnet — a different question, not a switch decision, until a mainnet exists to switch to.allnodes alternative →
- Everstake'a karşıEverstake is a top-tier delegated-staking operator with hundreds of thousands of retail delegators across 130+ chains (claimed; ~70+ verifiable per its own brief); Solidus Node proposes a different validator-eligibility model — identity-bound, not just key-bound — that doesn't exist as a production option yet.everstake alternative →
Solidus Network
Kimlik-L1 emsalleri. "Bir kimlik L1'i daha mı?" sorusunun cevabı bir iddia değil, bir malzeme listesidir.
- Concordium'a karşıConcordium is our closest framing rival — their tagline is almost ours. The real difference is not the pitch: it is that our method is registered in a public registry, our products are reachable, and our standards are someone else’s.concordium alternative →
- cheqd Network'a karşıcheqd built the clearest commercial thesis for an SSI L1 — pay-per-credential micropayments — and did:cheqd beat did:solidus into the W3C registry by years. Our wedge isn't a better token story; it's a shipped vertical product cheqd, by its own account, doesn't sell.cheqd alternative →
- KILT Protocol'a karşıKILT is the architectural precedent did:solidus's own W3C registry submission cites — same category, same DID-method model, six years earlier. The gap between us is production maturity, not design, and KILT has earned the word "audited" in a way we have not.kilt protocol alternative →
- Billions Network'a karşıBillions Network, formerly Polygon ID, is the best-funded ZK-identity project in the world with real enterprise customers. Its iden3/Circom proof format is proprietary to its own ecosystem; a Solidus credential is a W3C Verifiable Credential any relying party can check without adopting that ecosystem.billions network alternative →
- Worldcoin'a karşıWorldcoin proves you are a unique human, once, using proprietary iris-scanning hardware. Solidus's architecture issues W3C Verifiable Credentials for identity attributes — age, citizenship, verification status — with no biometric capture step in the flow. This is a foil comparison, not a feature bake-off Solidus is close to winning.worldcoin alternative →