Solidus Identity

Solidus Identity vs Mattr

Mattr is the credential platform banks and governments already trust; Solidus is the open protocol underneath, for buyers who'd rather hold their own keys than rent Mattr's.

Solidus is a public testnet: no mainnet, no token, no external audit, and no paying customer. Every claim below is checkable; none of them are a substitute for the certifications an incumbent already holds.

What Mattr does better

Where Solidus is different

Side by side

Solidus compared with Mattr. Rows marked as won by Mattr are noted in the final column.
FeatureSolidusMattr
Production maturityPublic testnet, unaudited, no paying customer4-5 years in productionMattr wins
Deployment referenceNoneNZ digital health pass and driver's license; NSW Digital Driver LicenceMattr wins
Trust registryNot yet productizedOperational, solved for government customersMattr wins
Selective disclosure (BBS+ / SD-JWT VC)Shipped on testnet, unauditedShipped in production, 4-5 yearsMattr wins
ArchitectureSovereign L1 protocolCentralized SaaS (Mattr VII); no L1 or token
Credential custodyUser-held keysMattr-hosted keys by default (customer-managed optional)
Native KYC / credential issuanceNative, via VerifyDeferred to a partner (e.g. Sumsub, Jumio), per brief
Source modelApache-2.0, open protocolProprietary SaaS; core platform closed
PricingFree testnet, no enterprise minimumEnterprise/gov SaaS, $100K-1M+/yr per brief

Check it yourself

did:solidus is registered in the W3C DID Method Registry: curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/did-extensions/pulls/713 → state: closed, merged: true, merged_at: 2026-07-04.

Compare the receipts, not the pitch.