Solidus Identity
Solidus Identity vs Trinsic
Trinsic has rebuilt its business model twice since 2019 chasing product-market fit in SSI. The protocol underneath Solidus doesn't change shape every two years.
Solidus nerede farklılaşıyor
- L1 protocol, Apache-2.0 open source, and native KYC issuance — three structural things Trinsic's own brief says it lacks, having been SaaS-only with a closed core platform through all three pivots.
- did:solidus is registered in the W3C DID Method Registry — a standards foothold independent of any one vendor's business model, which doesn't erode if a company repivots.
- Native KYC issuance via Verify in the same stack, where Trinsic's brief states it defers to and partners with issuers.
Yan yana
| Özellik | Solidus | Trinsic |
|---|---|---|
| Business-model stability | One protocol since inception | Three pivots since 2019: Sovrin/Indy infra → credential exchange → identity acceptance network |
| Architecture | Sovereign L1 protocol | SaaS only — no L1, no token, per brief |
| Source model | Apache-2.0, open protocol | Closed core platform, per brief |
| Native KYC / credential issuance | Native, via Verify | Deferred — partners with issuers, per brief |
| Standards participation | did:solidus registered in W3C DID Method Registry; DIF Associate Member | DIF and W3C VC WG participation; no registered DID method of its own |
Kendiniz kontrol edin
did:solidus is registered in the W3C DID Method Registry: curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/did-extensions/pulls/713 → state: closed, merged: true, merged_at: 2026-07-04.