Solidus Network

Solidus vs Worldcoin

Worldcoin proves you are a unique human, once, using proprietary iris-scanning hardware. Solidus's architecture issues W3C Verifiable Credentials for identity attributes — age, citizenship, verification status — with no biometric capture step in the flow. This is a foil comparison, not a feature bake-off Solidus is close to winning.

Solidus is a public testnet: no mainnet, no token, no external audit, and no paying customer. Every claim below is checkable; none of them are a substitute for the certifications an incumbent already holds.

What Worldcoin does better

Where Solidus is different

Side by side

Solidus compared with Worldcoin. Rows marked as won by Worldcoin are noted in the final column.
FeatureSolidusWorldcoin
Funding raisedNone disclosed~$240M raisedWorldcoin wins
Users / verified humansNone — testnet, no paying customer15M+ World App users, 6M+ Orb-verified humans (claimed)Worldcoin wins
Proof typeDocument + credential-based W3C VCBiometric — proprietary iris scan (the Orb) + Semaphore ZK
Biometric captureNone in the credential-issuance flowIris scan required via Orb hardware
DID method registered in W3C registrydid:solidus — registered 2026-07-04Proprietary World ID protocol — not a registered W3C DID method, per brief
TokenNone exists$WLD — token-incentivized registration
Regulatory actions on recordN/A — pre-launch testnet, no live product to regulate yetRestricted in Kenya, Spain (reinstated), Hong Kong; investigated by Germany's BfDI, per briefWorldcoin wins
Hardware moatNone — software/protocol onlyThe Orb — proprietary iris-scan hardware, hard to replicateWorldcoin wins

Check it yourself

Resolve a did:solidus DID against the live testnet RPC at rpc.solidus.network — the issuance flow has no biometric capture step, unlike Worldcoin's Orb-based registration.

Compare the receipts, not the pitch.