Solidus Verify

Solidus Verify vs Sumsub

Sumsub sells the check. Solidus issues a credential the user keeps and re-presents — so the second relying party never re-runs it. Different product category, different cost curve.

Solidus is a public testnet: no mainnet, no token, no external audit, and no paying customer. Every claim below is checkable; none of them are a substitute for the certifications an incumbent already holds.

What Sumsub does better

Where Solidus is different

Side by side

Solidus compared with Sumsub. Rows marked as won by Sumsub are noted in the final column.
FeatureSolidusSumsub
Initial KYC (gov ID + liveness)$5.00~$1.50–2.50Sumsub wins
Every re-verification after that$0.05 per presentationFull rate, every time
Break-evenCheaper from the 3rd verification onward
eIDAS 2 QTSP statusNot held — 2027 roadmapeIDAS QES heldSumsub wins
SOC 2 / ISO 27001Not held — 2027 roadmapSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001/27017/27018Sumsub wins
FATF Travel RuleNot offeredShipped productSumsub wins
Credential portabilityW3C VC — the user holds itResult returned to your tenant
Selective disclosureBBS+ (unaudited)Not offered
ArchitectureIssuer — you get a credentialCentralized SaaS — PII flows through their infrastructure

Check it yourself

npm i @solidus-network/auth @solidus-network/bbs — the BBS+ unlinkability demo ships inside the tarball. The implementation is UNAUDITED; an external audit is targeted H2 2026 via NLnet NGI Zero.

Compare the receipts, not the pitch.