Solidus Network

Solidus vs cheqd Network

cheqd built the clearest commercial thesis for an SSI L1 — pay-per-credential micropayments — and did:cheqd beat did:solidus into the W3C registry by years. Our wedge isn't a better token story; it's a shipped vertical product cheqd, by its own account, doesn't sell.

Solidus is a public testnet: no mainnet, no token, no external audit, and no paying customer. Every claim below is checkable; none of them are a substitute for the certifications an incumbent already holds.

cheqd Network neyi daha iyi yapıyor

Solidus nerede farklılaşıyor

Yan yana

Solidus, cheqd Network ile karşılaştırılıyor. cheqd Network tarafından kazanılan satırlar son sütunda belirtilmiştir.
ÖzellikSoliduscheqd Network
DID method registered in W3C registrydid:solidus — registered 2026-07-04did:cheqd — registered years earliercheqd Network kazanıyor
Trust registriesNot shippedShipped — on-chain Trust Registriescheqd Network kazanıyor
ConsensusHotStuff BFTCometBFT (Cosmos SDK)
Token / validator setNone — public testnet, 4-node dev committee$CHEQ live, ~50–100 validatorscheqd Network kazanıyor
Standards-body participationDIF Associate MemberActive DIF + Trust Over IP Foundation participation
Named infrastructure customersNone — no paying customerAnimo Solutions, Genobank, Hovi (India gov pilot)cheqd Network kazanıyor
Direct-to-fintech verification product7 live products on testnet, incl. verifyNone — sells infrastructure to SSI vendors, per its own positioning
Production maturityPublic testnet, unauditedCosmos SDK, battle-tested, live since 2021cheqd Network kazanıyor

Kendiniz kontrol edin

curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/did-extensions/pulls/713 → merged: true, merged_at 2026-07-04. Compare that entry against cheqd's own did:cheqd registration in the same public registry.

Vaadi değil, kanıtı karşılaştırın.

Solidus vs cheqd — two W3C-registered DID methods compared · Solidus Network